Artificial Intelligence is no longer confined to science fiction or research laboratories. It shapes how we live, work, learn, and interact. AI systems decide who gets hired, who receives a loan, which news stories we see, and even how we are monitored in public spaces. The efficiency of algorithms promises progress, yet their hidden biases, lack of transparency, and capacity for surveillance raise profound ethical questions.
Businesses are at the forefront of AI deployment. From human resources to supply chain optimisation and customer service, organisations increasingly rely on machine learning, predictive analytics, and generative technologies. But alongside innovation comes responsibility. If left unchecked, AI can reinforce systemic discrimination, undermine privacy, and treat human beings as data points rather than persons with dignity.
Society as a whole also bears responsibility. Regulators, educators, civil society groups, and individuals cannot remain passive. Choices about how AI is designed, trained, and implemented reflect values—whether inclusivity, fairness, accountability, or profit maximisation at any cost. As such, the debate about AI is not merely technical but profoundly moral.
Bias and Inequity: Algorithms trained on historical data risk amplifying existing inequalities in hiring, lending, or policing. A recruitment tool, for example, can inadvertently disadvantage women or marginalized communities.
Transparency and Accountability: AI decisions are often described as “black boxes.” Businesses must be accountable not only for outcomes but also for how those outcomes are produced.
Privacy and Surveillance: From facial recognition in public spaces to predictive policing, society must decide what trade-offs between safety and liberty are acceptable.
Corporate Responsibility: Companies cannot outsource ethics to engineers or regulators. They must embed ethical reflection into product design, governance, and board-level oversight.
Collective Responsibility: Governments must legislate wisely, educators must equip future leaders, and citizens must remain vigilant and informed. No single actor can ensure ethical AI alone.
Existential Threat: Some important people claim that AI can be an existential threat to humanity. While offering us plenty of opportunities, if not handedl carefully and responsibily (with ethics), it can lead to our own destruction.
This competition invites participants to think critically and creatively about AI’s future. Essays and infographics should:
Diagnose the Problem: Identify specific ways in which AI systems can drift into bias, inequity, or unethical outcomes.
Interrogate Responsibility: Explore the obligations of businesses, governments, and society at large in guiding AI’s trajectory.
Propose Guardrails: Suggest concrete frameworks—ethical principles, regulatory guidelines, or business practices—that can safeguard fairness and accountability.
Envision the Future: Imagine models of “responsible AI” that respect human dignity while enabling innovation and growth.
Why Participate?
The theme speaks to a decisive moment in history. We are the first generation to live fully in the “AI age,” yet we may also be the last to shape its foundations. How we respond will determine whether AI becomes a tool for human flourishing or a force of alienation and control.
This competition challenges young thinkers, business leaders, and engaged citizens to contribute to a national dialogue on ethics in technology. By writing essays or creating infographics, participants join a collective effort to ensure that Artificial Intelligence serves humanity, rather than diminishes it.
Would you like me to integrate this elaborated theme directly into the structured competition announcement I drafted earlier (with submission guidelines, prizes, etc.), so the webpage feels seamless? That way, the site will begin with this expanded theme statement before moving into logistics.
Essay Writing Competition (2,500–3,500 words)
Infographics/Poster Competition (visual entries with short explanatory note, max 200 words)
Participants may choose either format, or submit to both.
Word Limit: 2,500–3,500 words (excluding references)
Citation Style: APA, with clear references; plagiarism will result in disqualification
Focus: Choose a specific AI context (e.g., hiring algorithms, facial recognition, financial scoring). Diagnose the ethical challenges, examine responsibilities, and propose remedies.
Must be original and visually clear
Can use charts, illustrations, or conceptual diagrams
Should address one key theme (e.g., AI bias, privacy, responsibility frameworks)
Brief explanatory note (max 200 words) to accompany the visual
Announcement of Competition
Sept 15, 2025
Submission Deadline
July 10, 2026
Evaluation Period
July 11 – 25, 2026
Results Announced & Prizes Awarded
July 31, 2026
1st Prize: ₹20,000
2nd Prize: ₹15,000
3rd Prize: ₹10,000
Consolation Prizes: 10 × ₹2,000 each
1st Prize: ₹15,000
2nd Prize: ₹10,000
3rd Prize: ₹7,000
Consolation Prizes: 10 × ₹1,000 each
Certificates: All prize winners and shortlisted entries will receive digital certificates of recognition.
Publication: Select essays will be published in an edited volume (with ISBN/DOI), giving visibility to young thinkers.
Showcasing Visuals: Winning infographics/posters will be exhibited on XLRI’s campus and official platforms.
Networking Opportunity: Winners may be invited for a special ethics dialogue workshop hosted by XLRI faculty and industry leaders.
You will be asked the following information in the submission link.
Full Name
Academic/Professional Affiliation
Short Bio (100 words)
Files to be uploaded
Contact details
Comments
The link for submission is here
Contact
For queries, please write to: jrdtf@xlri.ac.in